Archive for the ‘politics’ Category

Back in Surrey

Sunday, August 29th, 2010

A bit of background first: I’m on a grand European tour (for work). There are three events: the combined UK/Lux voting project meetings in Surrey (UK), the summer school on voting I’m (co-)organising in Bertinoro (Italy) and the voting workshop in Fribourg (Switzerland).

So, I’m back at Uni of Surrey. It’s a bit weird to be here — for having lived here a mere three months, the place seems steeped in memories. There’s the breakup, the supermarket where I always got dinner, walking around town and enjoying the shops again…

Today was a good day. Dave, an UniS colleague, proposed on Friday eve in the pub to go swimming. There was an outdoor waterskiing center, that opened its track to swimmers in the early morning. Why not, sounded like a challenge. And it turned out to be! Woke up at 6:40 (continental time), so anxious was I. 30 minutes ahead of my alarm… We went there, I rented a wetsuit (previous experience: outdoor swimming over long distances works a hell of a lot better with wetsuit), and off we went! it went okay, though I’m not used to looking where I’m going (in a pool, you can easily tell if you’re going straight — not so simple outdoors). After a jacuzzi, Dave showed me the borough. We drove up to the gates of Windsor castle, and it was impressive. Windsor itself is fun too, a typical british hamlet with some tourist attractions (the leaning teahouse was unfortunately still closed). Next up was Ascot. Yes, Ascot! I treaded where the horses race… the grass is well-kept, long and quite wet that early in the morning :).

Onwards we went, through the borough, some quaint little villages left and right, till we got back to Guildford. Dave drove up the hill behind Castle carpark. I’d never been there, and the view is amazing! A bit further up the hill, you can even see Canary Wharf. We enjoyed our brunch at a restaurant, and then Dave had to leave.

Next up: shopping! My backpack had broken two days before this trip, so I needed a new one. Went to Argos, and found a cheap replacement. It’s not a high-quality bag, but for 5 pounds, you can’t expect much (got a wallet and a pencil case — both come in handy for this trip).

Final stop: books. I had run out of books, plus: I’m in the UK, they’ve got English books aplenty here — and that is what I predominantly read. I got myself the new instalment in a series by KE Mills (aka Karen Miller) I started reading while employed in Guildford. Plus more (Snow by Orhan Pamuk, the Turkish Nobel-prize winner), because I can and it came recommended :)

All of that was enough, so I went home, Tesco-lunch, home, worked a bit, and had dinner with Peter. Dinner was great for two reasons: one, we were having take-out Italian (and are going to Italy tomorrow); two, we ended up having a discussion on politics, on proportional representation versus geographical representation etc. That discussion was fun! Got us wondering when parties arose. It seems more logical in the Dutch (prop. rep.) setting than in the UK (geographical).

So: great day today, managed to do some work, still a lot of things to do before Wednesday :s. If time, I’ll try to post more after SecVote 2010.

Copyright online

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

Online copyright is a very complex issue. Actually, it’s sufficiently complex to dedicate a long, well though-out post to. Which is not this one.

This one is just fast and simple.
who makes money of a CD
I’ve read a bit about it. All of my reading was from websources — I cannot vouch for their accuracy. But what I’ve read is in line with that picture.

Don’t steal from artists. If you must steal, be like Robin Hood and steal from those that rob the small people.

Post triggered by news that the RIAA considers copyright law not effective enough

Beste Geert,

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

Gaat het een beetje? Ik zag op het nieuws, dat je weer eens in de rechtzaal moest verschijnen. Ze moeten ook altijd jou hebben he, het is niet eerlijk. Volgens de media vergeleek je het rechtsysteem in Nederland met dat van Noord-Korea, ten faveure van de laatste. Hoewel die vergelijking op zich lekker bekt, ben ik bang dat deze misschien niet het beoogde effect heet. Zie je Geert, Noord-Korea laat zich erg weinig in de kaarten kijken. Ik vermoed eigenlijk dat zelfs de AIVD jouw bewering niet kan staven. Dus als we je advies ter harte zouden willen nemen, dan nog ging dat niet. We hebben geen idee hoe ze het in Noord-Korea beter doen, dus we kunnen het niet kopiëren.

Het is maar goed dat je een partij bent begonnen, gericht op vrijheid. Wel heel erg typerend voor Nederland: begin een partij voor vrijheid, kom onder constant vuur te liggen, iedere keer weer de rechtzaal in. Tsssk. Die gekke Amerikanen vinden rechtzaken trouwens dan weer een toppunt van democratie, in de trant van “het recht is voor iedereen gelijk”. Wij weten wel beter, he Geert. Minaretten in Nederland, de Koran in Nederland, hoofddoekjes, en wie is de enige die zich afvraagt, waar “die mensen” denken zomaar de vrijheden vandaan te halen om dat hier te doen?? Juist ja: Geert.

En dat terwijl jij iedere keer voor de rechter wordt gesleept, je iedere keer moet verdedigen om te mogen zeggen wat jij vindt! Dat kan toch niet in een democratie, dat mensen die gelijk hebben iedere keer hun recht om dat te zeggen moeten verdedigen, terwijl mensen die ongelijk hebben niet continue voor de rechter worden gesleepd. Weet je Geert, dit land heeft gewoon een nieuw begrip van de vrijheid van meningsuiting nodig. Wat dacht je van “Alles wat Geert zegt, kan en zal tegen je gebruikt worden in de rechtbank”?

Veel sterkte met de rechtzaak,

Hugo.
PS: Ik lees net dat Google misschien, in het kader van de vrijheid, uit China vertrekt. Stel je voor, een Google-loos Nederland… Iedereen vrij om te denken zoals jij wilt!

Internetdemocracy: how not to

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

I just read that the Dutch government has opened a site where they ask citizens for input on pending legislation. Sounds promising, no?

I checked, curious as I am (it’s in Dutch, of course). The items I saw:

  • Wet prejudiciële vragen aan de Hoge Raad
  • Implementatie EU kaderbesluit recidive in strafzaken
  • Regeling gewasbeschermingsmiddelen en biociden

Great! We get to give our views on legalese!

They have got to be kidding.

“De consultatie betreft het voorontwerp van de introductie van een prejudiciele procedure…”

I really thought no one was using such language. Well, I guess this is doomed to failure untill they get a translation into Dutch.

Opt-in vs. opt-out in Dutch healthcare

Saturday, November 1st, 2008

logo donorregisterThe Netherlands is currently in the process of establishing an Electronic Patient Dossier (EPD). This “facilitates the rapid and reliable exchange of medical information” (my translation). Medical personell, including doctors, farmacies, etc. then can easily access your private health record. Isn’t that great and convenient?

Well, perhaps some weird people might be too old-fashioned for all this electronic goodyness. To appease these few strange individuals, there is an opt-out procedure.

In other news: the Netherlands suffers from a lack of donors. A bit of googling will lead to wildly varying results, but the trend seems to be that there is a quite substantial group of Dutch citizens willing to act as donors, but who didn’t opt-in for this. Last time the donor registration system was evaluated, the call for an opt-out process went unheeded.

I realise that opt-out organ donation is a tricky ethical question – the system will mark people as donors who are not willing to act as such. Apparently, this was deemed so severe, that the untapped potential of Dutch donors remains that. So that seems to indicate a choice for liberty, even at the cost of lives potentially saved.

And then the EPD wanders in. The government chooses an opt-out procedure, claiming that the EPD will save lives. At the cost of wide-spread sharing of private information. But, you know, you can opt-out.

So, we’re unwilling to address a very real and existing problem (lack of donor organs) using opt-out, even though there is a sizeable untapped potential out there. And on this new gizmo we slap the label “saves lives” and that is more than sufficient justification to have an opt-in system?
Is it just me or is the Dutch government being inconsistent here (to say the very least)?

[Edit: Here’s a link of the Dutch government on why not to have opt-in donor registration. My view: this blows.]

[Edit2: I cannot find how to declare myself a donor in a fashion recognised throughout Europe. That blows too. Just so at least more people know: me = donor.]

[Edit3: On being a donor in Europe: got a response from the donor-register in NL (though not one from Postbus 51, although they did promise to do so in 5 days…). Basically: wear a donor-card, e.g. this one from America (easiest find… NL doesn’t have them anymore…:() I’m hoping English is understood well enough throughout the EU, although you never know for sure…]