Archive for January, 2010

Reading binge

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

In the New Years holidays, I finally got round to shopping for books — I had received several boekenbonnen “book coupons”, and was aching to spend them. This has kind of triggered me into a reading frenzy. Here is a short overview of what was read and what is still pending:

  • Bill Bryson – A Short History of Nearly Everything
    A popular science book — a weakness of mine. It’s a fun read, although near the end its focus is on pre- and early human earth history (no, not the egyptians, but from apes and monkeys onwards). That is not my preferred type of popular science, as it turns out. All in all, an interesting read. Learned several new things. Forgot most of them by now :).
  • Michio Kaku – Physics of the Impossible
    Michio is a theoretical physicist. In this book, he speculates on how certain cool technologies from scifi could theoretically eventually be achieved by technology, given our current understanding of physics. Subjects he treats: force fields, teleportation, starships, phasers, the death star, invisibility, faster than light travel, etc. His treatment is mostly focused on the physics involved — you don’t get blueprints, just a feel whether or not a technology which for all practical purposes mimicks the SF gimmick is possible according to physics. Fun read. Then again, I am a nerd ;-)
  • Mohsin Hamid – The Reluctant Fundamentalist
    A very interesting story, told in first person perspective, about an American in Pakistan, who is suddenly greeted by a local while the American is sitting down for a drink. The local begins to slowly tell him a tale…
    I really liked the book, and heartily recommend it! I won’t divulge more so as to avoid spoilers.
  • Cecelia Ahern – Thanks for the memories
    Apparently, Cecelia wrote a famous book, which led to her becoming an established author. Fine by moi. This book is the first I’ve read from her, and it’s okay. In points it is quite good, in others it dragged on a bit much. It’s a story about a man who is divorced, moved back to the UK, and now trying to reestablish his life, and a woman who at the beginning suffers a trauma. (Wanted to write “terrible trauma”, but thtat would be a tautology, wouldn’t it?) Of course it’s a romantic book, although perhaps not trodding down every known path. It’s a fun read if you’re on a reading binge — and I am :)

Still to read:

  • J.K. Rowling – Harry Potter et Le Prisonnier d’Azkaban
    Yep, it’s my second go at reading an HP book in French. And boy, did my French decline… I’ve started, but got distracted and have little incentive to continue. Still, with perseverence, determination and… well, French, I will actually read the damn thing and hopefully whoop my French back into a semblance of shape.
  • Richard Feynman – QED
    Besides meaning “Quod Erat Demonstrandum” (What has been proven — used to denote the end of a proof), “QED” can also mean Quantum Electro Dynamics — the unification of quantum theory with electrodynamics. And the latter field is the one where Richard Feynman got his Nobel prize in physics. It’s not a big book, so perhaps it’s readable. Who knows? Then again, Feynman was a very good theoretical physicist, and I am not. Still, who knows, I might enjoy it :)(update: took a short break, started reading, so far it’s captivating)
  • Douglas Hofstaeder – Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid
    Yes that’s a reread. Halfway through, been at that for more than one year.. probably closer to two. Anyway, will finish it eventually :)
  • Roger Penrose – The Emporer’s New Mind
    This is Roger Penrose doing his version of Gödel, Escher, Bach. And that is ouch. Where Feynman is a wellknown and good theoretical physicist, Penrose is (apparently) lesser-known, but sure as hell not one bit less theoretically or physicisty. In order to explain how the mind might work, according to him, we need some background info. So in one chapter, he treats classical physics. From Ptolemaic astronomy up to and including the theory of relativity. Le ouch. And that is just background info, so Penrose gives you a feel for Weylian tensor’s role in relativity theory. You are spared the details. So yeah, pending.

So what can I say about this reading binge except that I’m focusing a lot on PopSci? Not much… except that I am almost out!! PANIC!
Luckily I brought back Prince of Persia and Beyond Good and Evil for the GameCube. Especially the latter has an interesting story arc — in a way, it is a story waiting to be read. Just a bit more active.

Beste Geert,

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

Gaat het een beetje? Ik zag op het nieuws, dat je weer eens in de rechtzaal moest verschijnen. Ze moeten ook altijd jou hebben he, het is niet eerlijk. Volgens de media vergeleek je het rechtsysteem in Nederland met dat van Noord-Korea, ten faveure van de laatste. Hoewel die vergelijking op zich lekker bekt, ben ik bang dat deze misschien niet het beoogde effect heet. Zie je Geert, Noord-Korea laat zich erg weinig in de kaarten kijken. Ik vermoed eigenlijk dat zelfs de AIVD jouw bewering niet kan staven. Dus als we je advies ter harte zouden willen nemen, dan nog ging dat niet. We hebben geen idee hoe ze het in Noord-Korea beter doen, dus we kunnen het niet kopiëren.

Het is maar goed dat je een partij bent begonnen, gericht op vrijheid. Wel heel erg typerend voor Nederland: begin een partij voor vrijheid, kom onder constant vuur te liggen, iedere keer weer de rechtzaal in. Tsssk. Die gekke Amerikanen vinden rechtzaken trouwens dan weer een toppunt van democratie, in de trant van “het recht is voor iedereen gelijk”. Wij weten wel beter, he Geert. Minaretten in Nederland, de Koran in Nederland, hoofddoekjes, en wie is de enige die zich afvraagt, waar “die mensen” denken zomaar de vrijheden vandaan te halen om dat hier te doen?? Juist ja: Geert.

En dat terwijl jij iedere keer voor de rechter wordt gesleept, je iedere keer moet verdedigen om te mogen zeggen wat jij vindt! Dat kan toch niet in een democratie, dat mensen die gelijk hebben iedere keer hun recht om dat te zeggen moeten verdedigen, terwijl mensen die ongelijk hebben niet continue voor de rechter worden gesleepd. Weet je Geert, dit land heeft gewoon een nieuw begrip van de vrijheid van meningsuiting nodig. Wat dacht je van “Alles wat Geert zegt, kan en zal tegen je gebruikt worden in de rechtbank”?

Veel sterkte met de rechtzaak,

Hugo.
PS: Ik lees net dat Google misschien, in het kader van de vrijheid, uit China vertrekt. Stel je voor, een Google-loos Nederland… Iedereen vrij om te denken zoals jij wilt!

Adblocking: not as evil as claimed?

Friday, January 8th, 2010

Yesterday, I wanted to watch the next episode of a series I’m following. So I went to my trusty streaming site for this series. However, upon trying to start streaming the episode, I got a page that said “you’re using adblocking software, please don’t, we need the revenue”. Well, fair’s fair, I am using adblocking software, and I don’t begrudge them advertising income. so I turned it off. My mistake.

The episode did start, but halted every 5th second or so, due to laoding problems. That I found out after I had found the episode — it was hiding behind several overlay ads. So, in order to be a decent netizen for this site, I was forced into a state where the site’s actual content was hard to find, and impossible to enjoy.

That’s of course a big bye bye. But it got me thinking. The reason the site needs advertising revenue is, obviously, to pay for bandwidth. By using and adblocking filter, I am not using bandwidth that would be wasted on me. So the effectiveness of their ads increases if I use adblocking software, while the average bandwidth usage per visited page decreases.

That’s even not investigating the advertising revenue model. If it’s based on click-throughs, forcing them on my screen will only annoy me and cost you bandwidth. If it is based on number of views, well, then if I were an advertiser, I’d want some numbers on how number of views corresponds to number of visits to my site or sales. That ratio is going down again if you force it on people using adblocking software.

So there will be a negative effect to forcing visitors to turn off their adblocking software. Nevertheless, I would guess thain the current situation, this is more than offset by the positive effect of more advertisement views. Then again, as an advertiser, I would prefer to spend my money on people that will buy as a result of the ad. That would be the 100% perfect spending of advertisement money (unless you’re trying to establish a name, of course). Makes you wonder if in this Digital Era, perhaps advertisement models will evolve to be more and more precise/finnicky about this.

Curious to hear your thoughts!

Happy New Year!

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

So many updates to post, I’m skipping a long story and going straight to the list-format:

  • Finished both Bowser’s inside story and Professor Layton and Pandora’s Box. (±36 hrs and ±18 hrs, respectively).
  • I visited Stijn, Maartje and Iris, was great! But that’s none of your business :)
  • I went to see Bobbie’s new place, it’s pretty cool but I came a bit soon — Bobbie hasn’t moved in yet (put in furniture, but usually sleeps elsewhere).  So, I better revisit him later :)
  • Visited Ronald as well, though failed to see his new house. Still wondering who will see whose house first, him mine or me his. Might make an appointment for the 23rd just to win ;-)
  • Bro came here, and we had the full ritual, and it was *good*!! inducto-gourmet, Battlestar, Mario,  Ikea, shopping, car… all the essential ingredients were there :)
  • Finished Battlestar Galactica, the reimagining. Not fully happy with the ending, but okay. Can’t win ’em all :)
  • Redecorated the place. It’ll probably be a few days before I’ve finished building the new furniture, actually :) But most has been done, and looks good, really good. Will take pictures.
  • New furniture offers new ways of storing stuff (finally! racks for in the garage!), so probably within $IMTOOLAZY I’ll have sorted out some of my stuff and make more use of the available space :)
  • Bianca and Matthijs are coming over next weekend!!
  • Dutch television is turning stupider and stupider. I’m not talking content, I am talking dubbing. It’s evil, it’s bad, and we should put a stop to it.  I mean, subtitles appear to be used more often in the news (to subtitle people talking Dutch with an accent) than for cartoons…

That’s it from the Bourg! Happy New Year to all!